National
Board for Certification of School Nurses
POSITION STATEMENT
SCHOOL NURSE CERTIFICATION
HISTORY:
The profession
and the public expect nurses to be fully qualified and competent in
order to deliver quality nursing services. Licensure exists to
provide for the public's safety (Pohlman, 2001). Licensure is
mandated and conferred by a governmental agency and usually deals with
minimum levels of nursing competency as compared to specialty practice
(Gregory & Marcontel, 2000). Nursing licensure is managed at
the state level, most often by its board of nursing. Professional
competency involves more than knowledge. Competency includes
critical thinking and logical, safe, and evidence-based decision
making. Certification is a voluntary process by which a
nongovernmental agency recognizes the knowledge, skills, and abilities
(competence) in a specialty practice (American Board of Nursing
Specialties, 2002). School nursing is a specialty nursing practice
and has a unique body of clinical knowledge and standards of
practice. The National Association of School Nurses (NASN)
identified the importance of promoting school nursing competence and
initiated action to develop school nurse certification.
Subsequently, the National Board for Certification of School Nurses (NBCSN)
was formed and the first national, professional certification
examination was given in 1986. The American Nurses Credentialing
Center (ANCC), affiliated with the American Nurses Association (ANA),
withdrew in 2000 from the activity of national certification (Schwab, Hootman, Gelfman, Gregory, &
Pohlman, 2001).
ISSUE:
School nursing
is a demanding specialty. Its practice requires a breadth of
clinical knowledge and skills in order to work safely and effectively
with vast populations, with individuals having great differences in
physiological, emotional, and cognitive needs and responses, and with
the autonomous and unique nature of school communities. Because
the science of school nursing is ever changing and growing in
complexity, school nurses must be dedicated to life long professional
learning. Certification is an ongoing process and subsequently
helps to validate current competency. Some states require school
nurses to be certified in a process that mirrors teacher
certification. The national examination was not and is not meant
to be in conflict with state agency certification (Blair, Henry,
Marcontel, & Miller, 1986).
RATIONALE:
School and
health care reforms are mandating professional accountability and risk
management. Certification is the best way to ensure core knowledge
and judgment for competent practice and to establish a level of safe,
quality service (Costante, 2001, pg. 499). The purpose of
certification continues to be the promotion of safe and effective school
nursing services (Professional Testing Corporation, 2002).
Certification gives consumers more information about the qualifications
of providers and subsequently increased selection options (Cary,
2001). Certification tests are constructed and evaluated using
psychometrically sound methods. The certifying body assures that
test scores are sufficiently reliable and that passing scores are fair
to all candidates, using sound psychometric methods (American Board of
Nursing Specialties, 2001). Certification provides the personal
and professional validation of mastering core school nurse specialty
practice knowledge and may afford professional and financial advancement
(Gregory & Marcontel, 2001). Certification sets a standard for
school nurse education.
CONCLUSION:
It is the
position of the National Board for Certification of School Nurses that
students and school districts are entitled to competent school
nurses. Furthermore, it is the position of NBCSN that school
districts should act to ensure school nurse competency by supporting
educational opportunities that afford the attainment of school nurse
certification and by establishing policy that mandates continuing
education and school nurse certification in the course of employment.
REFERENCES
American Board
of Nursing Specialties. Standards. Retrieved November 24, 2001 from the
World Wide Web: http://www.nursingcertification.org/standards.htm
Blair, B.,
Henry, S., Marcontel, M., & Miller, W. (1986). National
Certification of School Nurses. School Nurse, 2:3 (18-23)
Carey, A.
(2001). Certified Registered Nurse: Results of the Study of the
Certified Workforce. American Journal of Nursing, 101:1 (44-52)
Costante, C.
(2001). Future Challenges for School Health Services and the Law: A
Manager's Perspective. In Schwab, N. and Gelfman, M. (eds). Legal
Issues in School Nursing. North Branch MN: Sunrise River Press.
Gregory, B.,
Marcontel, M. (2001). National School Nurse Certification Part II:
Questions and Answers. Journal of School Nursing, 17:3 (157-161)
Gregory, B.,
Marcontel, M. (2000). National School Nurse Certification Part I: An
Ongoing Process. Journal of School Nursing, 16:4 (48-53)
Pohlman, K.
(2001). Legal Framework and Financial Accountability for School Nursing
Practice. In Schwab, N. and Gelfman, M. (eds). Legal Issues in School
Nursing. North Branch MN: Sunrise River Press.
Professional
Testing Corporation. (2002). Certification Handbook for School Nurses:
Handbook for Candidates. New York: Author. Retrieved March 27, 2002 from
the World Wide Web: http://www.ptcny.com
Schwab, N.,
Hootman, J., Gelfman, M. with Gregory, B., Pohlman, K. (2001). School
Nursing Practice: Professional Performance Issues. Legal Issues in
School Nursing. North Branch MN: Sunrise River Press.